On 19 oct. 10, at 23:13, Cor Nouws wrote: >>> Joining the global users lists, gives the largest public, so more >>> knowledge / international exchange. I find that useful in some >>> cases. >> >> That works only for people who understand English. So it is not >> global by definition. > > That is true, so a [email protected] would show that difference.
Definitely. And [email protected] too. > Mind that common is (was?) that there is for example > an users@<language>.documentfoundation.org > as well as > a marketing or a dev@<language>.documentfoundation.org. > The place where people in a certain language area work together. > > For English that obviously does not work, and for Spanish and maybe more > languages too. > Therefore, we already see a list for a local/regional group in the US (iirc). Indeed. But that is beside the point I am making. _ALL_ lists should be identified by the language they use. Unless the lists are clearly and exclusively about global policy issues, in which case they should _theorically_ be multilingual (ie not explicitly refuse contributions because some list members do not understand the language of the post). Jean-Christophe Helary ---------------------------------------- fun: http://mac4translators.blogspot.com work: http://www.doublet.jp (ja/en > fr) tweets: http://twitter.com/brandelune -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
