On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 18:25 +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > On 19 oct. 10, at 18:15, Florian Effenberger wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Jean-Christophe Helary wrote on 2010-10-19 02.22: > the "global" discussion list should not be a mere "discussion" list but a > "policy" list where only items of global interest regarding TDF or LO are > discussed.
Not sure I totally agree that it should be the discuss list - but I do agree that it is a problem - even now with only two language discuss lists one needs to go between both to understand what is actually being discussed and worked on. I would not even insist this list of record if you will has to be in English - although it probably would be. The CMS discussion is an example - that should be happening in one place so people have a chance to keep up. Actually this may not be a language issue at all, and for this narrow subject - a list of record - it may simply be that after settling on what a voting membership looks like, then this is simply a list with moderated functions - the world may see what goes on, but only voting members discuss and it is the only place to discuss issues that span all the different groups in the foundation, linguistic or geographic or special interest based. In fact it is most likely to determine who will be in the voting membership from the current active people and use a list now, without the background noise to make the decisions we need to address now. Drew -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
