I'm new to the list, so don't know how bad it's gotten, but it seems to me that anyone who's been around the net a couple times knows what should be acceptable. Do we really need to spend time hammering it out into a social contract? As Fred said, just don't feed the trolls.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Greg Grossmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Creighton Samuels wrote: > > Well, thanks. However, I contest that *anything* that a few members, > > regardless of their status elsewhere, have anything to conclude that may > > be in any way binding on the rest of the membership of this list. I > > certainly do not consider it binding upon myself. > > Just wondering, if the FreeCulture.org board decided to enact a "CoC" or > "Social Contract" for the mailing list, would you consider that binding? > > Greg > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
