Sure! To actually qualify for DMCA safe harbour status, you have to register with the US copyright office. Not surprisingly, they require you to print out a form and mail it to them, along with some money ( the form can be acquired at http://www.copyright.gov/onlinesp/ ). It's actually 105$ now actually, now that I'm looking at it. You can also use their site to look at organizations who have this status.
Rich On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Adi Kamdar <[email protected]> wrote: > Rich, wanna explain the 80 bucks thing? > > -Adi > > > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Rich Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Perhaps Elizabeth would like to comment on this issue. >> >> @Kevin - I think that's a great idea. I'm tempted to suggest we create >> sublists, fc-hackers and fc-nerds errrr fc-academics to encourage more >> specific participation (of course, this could backfire.) >> >> Anyway, I think the Google victory was obvious and necessary. We should >> probably a robust Safe Harbor as the consolation prize of the FC movement. >> If we're stuck with the DMCA, at least we can strengthen the good bits. They >> don't even have safe harbor protections in Germany (and perhaps the rest of >> Europe, I'm not sure). >> >> By the way, got eighty bucks? You too can receive the same kind of >> protection Google has! I got DMCA safe-harbor status for my project, you may >> be interested in doing the same for yours. >> >> Rich >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Adi Kamdar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> To be honest, I wrote a paper about this sort of stuff (and YouTube >>> dominating the market) too... for Elizabeth's class :) >>> >>> -Adi >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Kevin Driscoll >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Definitely a little scary sharing term papers in a (semi-)public forum >>>> but it could be cool to start collecting some of the academic work >>>> that SFC members are doing. More and more often, I've seen people post >>>> something and mention off-hand that they wrote a paper on the topic... >>>> >>>> Kevin >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:00 PM, <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Message: 4 >>>> > Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:59:49 -0700 >>>> > From: Alex Kozak <[email protected]> >>>> > Subject: Re: [FC-discuss] Judge Sides with Google in Viacom Case >>>> > >>>> > Yea probably, but let me re-read it first. >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Alex Leavitt <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Alex, is it possible to read a copy of that paper? >>>> >> >>>> >> (Other) Alex >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Discuss mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>>> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
