We would need to understand the attributes that make up a "quality" discussion. For example, a design forum should be both inviting and provocative. What other attributes make for quality in a listserv?
Chauncey On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:34:30, pauric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chauncey: "It would be interesting to conduct a brief survey > regarding the overall quality of the discussions" > > If you or anyone else wants to respond with questions that would suit > such a quarterly review. I'll happily put the survey together and > conduct it. > > Lets crowdsource a solution to measuring quality (o; > > thanks - pauric > > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Posted from the new ixda.org > http://gamma.ixda.org/discuss?post=21519 > > > ________________________________________________________________ > Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! > To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe ................ http://gamma.ixda.org/unsubscribe > List Guidelines ............ http://gamma.ixda.org/guidelines > List Help .................. http://gamma.ixda.org/help > ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://gamma.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://gamma.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://gamma.ixda.org/help
