> what I would rather see is a live document (e.g. a Wiki) ... I also think this is a great idea. Wasn't there already an IA Wiki? Seems to be dead now. http://www.iawiki.org/
Seeing as I never used it, either, there must have been something wrong with it. What was it? Too little promotion? Not enough participation? Bad IA? As I recall it was loaded up with content at the beginning and rarely updated. One problem is that our community might not be big enough to reliably and continually generate rich content. Wikipedia's top 500 contributors write 50% of their content, but only comprise a tiny fraction of their audience. In our world, that means we'll need to rely on only maybe a dozen people to maintain a healthy Wiki. The IA Wiki model, then, would need to attract participation at a much higher level, I think. The concept, again, seems great. Maybe it really just needs the rubric of an org like IxDA to work. -Cf Christopher Fahey ____________________________ Behavior biz: http://www.behaviordesign.com me: http://www.graphpaper.com ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
