Got it. Looking at the results, looks like you focused on transaction based sites. Any specific type (e.g. shopping, account management, travel, hotel booking)? What was the make up of the sites you sampled for the models for testing? Also wondering if these were UK vs. US or another country focused sites. Just wondering if that might have contributed to the models you saw. I'm curious if there's some cultural impact here or not.
On Nov 21, 2007, at 2:25 PM, Luke Wroblewski wrote: > saw some but much higher amount of primary button on the right > alone. Or primary button on the right & secondary action on the left > (of the page). We didn't test the first, cause no secondary action. > We tested the second. Cheers! Todd Zaki Warfel President, Design Researcher Messagefirst | Designing Information. Beautifully. ---------------------------------- Contact Info Voice: (215) 825-7423 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://toddwarfel.com ---------------------------------- In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not. ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
