thus is a tangent from Andrei's thread on Twitter @ SxSWi.

"why us the person in front if you more important than the person a  
million miles away?"

the assumption coming from a pre-digital culture is that the people  
with you ate more important than those away from you.

I would like to suggest that in the digital cultural world that this  
distinction is blurted at beat or just outright arbitrary dependent on  
specific contextual queues.

Personally I believe there is a balance we ate going to learn to  
strike, but to do that we have to put aside our presumptions and allow  
new and different things to happen.

BTW, I am a lot less concerned about the example if people isn't media  
while a panel or speaker is going on, then I am about Andrei's example  
of people prioritizing their digital connections over those in front  
of them during 1-on-1 moments. But even then, I would allow for the  
possibility that someone can split their attention between the virtual  
& physical. To take a Buxtonism I don't think we have reached "G-d's  
Law" in terms of our abilities to attribute meaning and value to our  
virtual relationships.

- dave
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to