I'm not suggesting the approach is groundbreaking or anything that we don't already do when working through personas and task flows but what is novel - and this is indicated by the distinct paucity of comparable examples - is the execution of this natural-questioning approach.
As Marielle alluded to in her response this echoes the real-life barrista in their interrogation of the customer's likes and dislikes - their high-level motivations. Nick's example is equally novel but not quite as cleanly executed. The user's decisions aren't quite as straightforward when the pictures are so ambiguous. Granted, this isn't a simple polarised choice environment; choosing a holiday is a bit more involved than an Americano. Yet this doesn't exactly meet the Krug criteria, IMHO. More examples if you've got 'em... J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=33112 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
