You could establish a "Hall of Fame" for those items which transcend
some limit (time, views, votes, money). That allows these "all-time
greats" to stay spotlighted without eclipsing the "rising stars".
-- Jim
Via my iPhone
On Mar 23, 2009, at 6:48 AM, Bryan J Busch <[email protected]>
wrote:
Say you've got a list of the Top 5 Most Popular Whatevers. Is it
reasonable to fear that these top 5 will stay in the top 5, just
because they are positioned as the most popular?
If so, are there any best practices (or even anything you've used
successfully) for building an algorithm that will make sure the top 5
list isn't just a self-fulfilling prophecy?
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
