My vote goes to munin. Simpler than nagios, but does not scale well past 100 servers. On Dec 23, 2011 4:28 PM, "Paul Graydon" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nagios is so quick and simple to set up and use, might as well still roll > with it. > > Paul > > On 12/23/2011 11:13 AM, Tom Perrine wrote: > >> Dear monitoring gurus, >> >> What would you use for a monitoring solution for a *very* small site? >> Say no more than 3 servers, just the basic HTTP, SMTP and DNS >> services? >> >> In the "olden days" I would just do Nagios and be done, but.... >> What's the current "state of the art" in open source monitoring? >> >> I would like: >> up/down >> graphs of usage (like SMTP connections, DNS queries, disk space, etc) >> some kind of alerting (email or SMS) would be a "nice to have" >> >> Thanks! >> >> --tep >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss<https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss> >> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators >> http://lopsa.org/ >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss<https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss> > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
