DC> Personally, I detest messages which claim to come from somebody I know
DC> but examination of the headers reveals they actually came from such a
DC> marketing company. Even if the message was authorized, I object to the
DC> practice as fraudulent.
AC> The reality is the exact opposite. It's best practice to use outside
AC> services or separate servers for mass mail, you don't want your
AC> corporate email server's reputation being tarnished by mass mail.
That doesn't sound like the opposite to me: If you're using an outside
service to send mass mail, precisely so that it doesn't tarnish your
reputation, isn't that in some sense fraudulent? You want to send the
mail, but you want to obfuscate the fact that you're sending it.
Maybe that isn't what Dave Close meant, though.
-Josh ([email protected])
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
