Here are a few references to a cases regarding permatemps:
http://204.200.167.203/cases/c-kingcounty-clark.html
http://204.200.167.203/cases/c-microsoft-vizcaino.html
http://204.200.167.203/cases/c-cityofseattle-glaser.html
There are a few more at the bottom of this page:
http://204.200.167.203/pastcases.html
cheers,
ski
On 12/10/2012 10:43 AM, Moose Finklestein wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:19 PM, drich <[email protected]> wrote:
I have heard this before, but no one has ever provided a citation. Do you
know *where* it is stated to be illegal under Ca. law?
Dr Google says that the rights of "permatemps" is not completely clear
*but* that there have been lawsuits from groups who were clearly hired
as "temps" but required to work as full employees (ie. doing the same
job as "regular" employees), while being denied the benefits of a full
employee.
See:
http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/california_labor_law/california-labor-law-state-13-11855.html?utm_expid=3607522-0
which sadly does not reference any actual case law. And they were
for municipal jobs, which is a whole other ball of disaster, no pun
intended, which may not be applicable to folks working for
corporations.
Most of the law I can find about temporary employees in .ca.us is
about how they must be paid.
I Am Not A Lawyer. But I play one in my Pree-Sk00l Lawyerz Office Playset.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
--
"When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it
connected to the entire universe" John Muir
Chris "Ski" Kacoroski, Director of LOPSA, [email protected],
206-501-9803 or ski98033 on most IM services
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
