We've tried both for kernel projects call. I can't speak about bluejeans because I did not ever get access; maybe Mike V. can chime in as he provided the account for trial.
For Zoom, the attendee list is not included as demonstrated here from Tuesday's Kernel Projects Call [0], unless it appears on the screen recording as part of the normal call. That is probably not what you are looking for though. However, I know Casey has been key in convincing them to add parity features, so it may be possible to get this added at some point. Regards, Ryan Goulding [0] https://zoom.us/recording/play/aWexfQ62BFoz6R2hHf3vqftLqox-BRVt1XqK057i4bWtMvNlxBzJ51gOp50dUPoA On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Lori Jakab <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Casey Cain <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello, Everyone! >> >> At the request of the Technical Community I have been investigating >> alternative conference platforms for OpenDaylight to use to conduct weekly >> and impromptu meetings. >> >> The community has gravitated to 2 solutions. Zoom and Bluejeans. Most >> of the community is familiar with Bluejeans and has likely used it at one >> point. Zoom is a relative newcomer to the conference scene but is very >> popular and becoming rapidly adopted by a number of organizations including >> the Linux Foundation and several of it's Incorporated Projects. >> >> Both platforms have feature parity for the basics of conferencing. HD >> Audio and Video, Ability to connect from China, Mobile app support for iOS >> and Android, MP4 Recordings, 50 participants per call (Upgradeable), Local >> Dial in numbers in 70+ countries, Per user based licence model >> >> There are some key differences though. >> >> Zoom has full cross platform support for Linux, Windows and Mac as well >> as some interesting collaborative features and in conference polling. Zoom >> does have limited Cloud storage, but this is offset by the ability for >> users to record locally. Zoom's biggest flaw that I have seen so far is >> that a paid licence (from the same account that scheduled the meeting) must >> be logged into the meeting or it will end automatically after 40 minutes. >> Zoom will cost the OpenDaylight Project $1,650/y >> >> Bluejeans does not have full cross-platform support for Linux but does >> support Mac, Windows and mobile platforms. Despite the lack of full Linux >> platform support, Bluejeans does have a web client that works on all >> platforms (*though it is currently buggy). The advantages of Bluejeans are >> Unlimited cloud storage and the scheduler of the meeting is not required to >> be present during the meeting, though some collaborative features such as >> recording will be disabled if the host is not present. >> Bluejeans will cost the OpenDaylight Project $3,000/y >> >> The OpenDaylight trial period for Zoom expires on April 18th and the >> offer from Bluejeans at $25 per licence (Down from $79 per licence) expires >> on April 21st. >> > > While I don't like the proprietary file format, one thing I do like about > WebEx recordings is the ability to see the participant list. It's not a big > deal really, but does any of the alternatives support this or plan to > support it? > > Other than that I haven't had enough experience with either so for now I > have to abstain from voting, for me proper Linux support is probably the > highest on the priority list. > > -Lori > > > _______________________________________________ > TSC mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
