Hmm....  I was able to see the participation list on Tue's call.

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Ryan Goulding <[email protected]>
wrote:

> We've tried both for kernel projects call.  I can't speak about bluejeans
> because I did not ever get access;  maybe Mike V. can chime in as he
> provided the account for trial.
>
> For Zoom, the attendee list is not included as demonstrated here from
> Tuesday's Kernel Projects Call [0], unless it appears on the screen
> recording as part of the normal call.  That is probably not what you are
> looking for though.  However, I know Casey has been key in convincing them
> to add parity features, so it may be possible to get this added at some
> point.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ryan Goulding
>
> [0] https://zoom.us/recording/play/aWexfQ62BFoz6R2hHf3vqftLqox-
> BRVt1XqK057i4bWtMvNlxBzJ51gOp50dUPoA
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Lori Jakab <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Casey Cain <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, Everyone!
>>>
>>> At the request of the Technical Community I have been investigating
>>> alternative conference platforms for OpenDaylight to use to conduct weekly
>>> and impromptu meetings.
>>>
>>> The community has gravitated to 2 solutions.  Zoom and Bluejeans.  Most
>>> of the community is familiar with Bluejeans and has likely used it at one
>>> point.  Zoom is a relative newcomer to the conference scene but is very
>>> popular and becoming rapidly adopted by a number of organizations including
>>> the Linux Foundation and several of it's Incorporated Projects.
>>>
>>> Both platforms have feature parity for the basics of conferencing. HD
>>> Audio and Video, Ability to connect from China, Mobile app support for iOS
>>> and Android, MP4 Recordings, 50 participants per call (Upgradeable), Local
>>> Dial in numbers in 70+ countries, Per user based licence model
>>>
>>> There are some key differences though.
>>>
>>> Zoom has full cross platform support for Linux, Windows and Mac as well
>>> as some interesting collaborative features and in conference polling.  Zoom
>>> does have limited Cloud storage, but this is offset by the ability for
>>> users to record locally.  Zoom's biggest flaw that I have seen so far is
>>> that a paid licence (from the same account that scheduled the meeting) must
>>> be logged into the meeting or it will end automatically after 40 minutes.
>>> Zoom will cost the OpenDaylight Project $1,650/y
>>>
>>> Bluejeans does not have full cross-platform support for Linux but does
>>> support Mac, Windows and mobile platforms.  Despite the lack of full Linux
>>> platform support, Bluejeans does have a web client that works on all
>>> platforms (*though it is currently buggy).  The advantages of Bluejeans are
>>> Unlimited cloud storage and the scheduler of the meeting is not required to
>>> be present during the meeting, though some collaborative features such as
>>> recording will be disabled if the host is not present.
>>> Bluejeans will cost the OpenDaylight Project $3,000/y
>>>
>>> The OpenDaylight trial period for Zoom expires on April 18th and the
>>> offer from Bluejeans at $25 per licence (Down from $79 per licence) expires
>>> on April 21st.
>>>
>>
>> While I don't like the proprietary file format, one thing I do like about
>> WebEx recordings is the ability to see the participant list. It's not a big
>> deal really, but does any of the alternatives support this or plan to
>> support it?
>>
>> Other than that I haven't had enough experience with either so for now I
>> have to abstain from voting, for me proper Linux support is probably the
>> highest on the priority list.
>>
>> -Lori
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TSC mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to