+1 On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Thanh Ha <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Robert Varga <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 17/05/17 21:11, Andrew Grimberg wrote: >> > We've got changes still open going all the way back to 2013! I would >> > like to put a proposal out that we auto-abandon changes that are >6 >> > months in age and in all honesty I would like to do it for any change >> > that is >6 weeks old but I figured that 6 months was a good starting >> point. >> >> I am not sure I like auto-abandon, two main reasons being: >> >> 1) I do have a bunch of patches that I mean to return to, but are low >> priority right now. I certainly would not like them disappearing from my >> dashboard, although that would be okay if there was a 'My Abandoned >> Changes' view. >> >> 2) We were bitten by 'abandon' before, where a patch was abandoned while >> it was waiting for dust to settle on after a release. The end result was >> a bug report for something that should have been fixed for 6+ months and >> a wasted day digging through history to understand where the fix went >> missing. Bug tracking should help here, but BZ is simply awful for >> tracking things to be delivered to multiple branches. >> >> At any rate, 6 weeks is definitely too aggresive. >> >> Regards, >> Robert >> > > I agree with Robert. I too use DRAFTs and old patches that I eventually > get back to as they are low priority at the moment. Auto abandon will make > us forget about these low priority work in progress. > > Thanh > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
