On 17/05/17 21:11, Andrew Grimberg wrote: > We've got changes still open going all the way back to 2013! I would > like to put a proposal out that we auto-abandon changes that are >6 > months in age and in all honesty I would like to do it for any change > that is >6 weeks old but I figured that 6 months was a good starting point.
I am not sure I like auto-abandon, two main reasons being: 1) I do have a bunch of patches that I mean to return to, but are low priority right now. I certainly would not like them disappearing from my dashboard, although that would be okay if there was a 'My Abandoned Changes' view. 2) We were bitten by 'abandon' before, where a patch was abandoned while it was waiting for dust to settle on after a release. The end result was a bug report for something that should have been fixed for 6+ months and a wasted day digging through history to understand where the fix went missing. Bug tracking should help here, but BZ is simply awful for tracking things to be delivered to multiple branches. At any rate, 6 weeks is definitely too aggresive. Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
