+1 I think we should do it. I had spent good 1 hour to look at lot of age old openflowplugin patches to abandon them.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Grimberg < [email protected]> wrote: > Greetings folks, > > As I'm trying to figure out the logistics related to migrating ODL from > our current identity backend to The Linux Foundation Identity (LFID) > backend I've been investigating a lot of different things related to > Gerrit. One of the things I noticed is that we have a lot of changes > that are old and still open. > > We've got changes still open going all the way back to 2013! I would > like to put a proposal out that we auto-abandon changes that are >6 > months in age and in all honesty I would like to do it for any change > that is >6 weeks old but I figured that 6 months was a good starting point. > > Please note that this is age of last activity, not age of initial change > or last patch update. So an old change that happens to have regular use > for some reason (such as trigger testing) via comments should not be > affected by this, even if they are, it's an abandon and not an actual > removal from the system so they won't disappear, they'll just be removed > from the status:open search. > > I'm proposing that this change happen after we finally get Carbon out > the door as it's going to require a restart to Gerrit to have the > configuration updated to start this. > > -Andy- > > -- > Andrew J Grimberg > Lead, IT Release Engineering > The Linux Foundation > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > -- Thanks Anil
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
