We'll talk about this in our meeting tonight and let you know. Ron
On 2012-08-21 14:45, Ian E. Trump wrote: > The Winnipeg Free Press Reporter who gave us a favourable review int he paper > is on my linked in, Ron do you want her information? > > Ian Trump > Octopi Managed Services > (204) 770 8894 > [email protected] > > > > > > From: Ron > Sent: Tue 21-Aug-12 14:35 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] Fwd: [INFO@AW] Re: Wet spot on stairs (& on > our reputation?) > > > That's a really cool idea! > > Ron > > On 2012-08-21 14:29, LES.NET (1996) INC. wrote: > > Expanding on some of the threads below... > > > > This might make an interesting news segment.. > > > > hackerspace uses readily available technologies to nap perps... > > > > might get some tv time out of it, and they may even broadcast the stills > > of them looking at the camera. > > > > > > > > On 08/21/2012 09:59 AM, Justin Lacko wrote: > > > Some of the AssentWorks folks weigh in on posting the urination > > > video... I think we should make a police report to show due diligence > > > in this matter and not treat it as low-brow humour as mentioned below > > > in this email. > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: Robert Elms<[email protected]> > > > Date: 21 August 2012 06:33 > > > Subject: Fwd: [INFO@AW] Re: Wet spot on stairs (& on our reputation?) > > > To: Justin Lacko<[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry Justin, I meant to forward these messages to you, too. > > > Robert > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: Robert Elms<[email protected]> > > > Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:07 AM > > > Subject: Re: [INFO@AW] Re: Wet spot on stairs (& on our reputation?) > > > To: Michael Legary<[email protected]>, AssentWorks > > > <[email protected]>, David Bernhardt > > > <[email protected]>, Colin Stanners<[email protected]>, Tom > > > Tessier<[email protected]>, AssentWorks INFO Mailing List > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > I think that Tom is right, much of the public's perception of us will > > > be determined by how we handle this offence. Whether we are seen as IT > > > savvy, responsible citizens, who are using technology to help the > > > police identify the offenders and thereby discouraging such public > > > mischief or we are seen merely as irresponsible voyeurs, who are using > > > this video to seek attention and satisfy our own puerile pleasure, > > > will be based largely on our behaviour. The question that many people > > > will be asking is: What did they (Skullspace/AssentWorks members) do > > > with the video, offer it to the police as evidence or just exploit it > > > as a source of low-brow entertainment? Has anyone contacted the police > > > yet? > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:28 AM, AssentWorks<[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > >> Based on their actions in the video finding the cams and then leaving, I > > >> suspect they not be back. However, if we printed their pics and posted > > >> them on the wall in the lobby, they will be the message. > > >> > > >> Sent from my iPad > > >> > > >> On 2012-08-21, at 1:16, "Tom Tessier"<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Here's a suggestion for this to be positive. > > >>> > > >>> If it's the police releasing the video looking for "suspects", it's them > > >>> releasing it, not us. It would be Skullspace's diligent, leading-edge, > > >>> awesome > > >>> networking technology and the smart people that implemented it that > > >>> actually > > >>> caught someone on tape. And then, as conscientious IT professionals, > > >>> passed it > > >>> to the police for them to do as they deem fit. Like the case in > > >>> Toronto, where > > >>> the police there are looking for the person who did....something > > >>> similar but > > >>> on a homeless person. > > >>> > > >>> Frankly, this bugger shouldn't just get away with it. More to the > > >>> point, it > > >>> might be a way for him to get that psychological help he so desperately > > >>> needs. > > >>> > > >>> I hear what you say on the association of our groups; but remember, the > > >>> government funding agencies and our sponsors do associate us. > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 01:05:22 -0500, Colin Stanners wrote > > >>>> I don't believe many people outside our members associate sksp and > > >>>> AW; even a number of members have never been on the opposite side. This > > >>>> video has been only put up under the sksp label. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Tom Tessier > > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> P.S. - Midnight update - The video now has 17,000 hits, with over 2/3 > > >>>>> in > > >>> the > > >>>>> last 4 hours. This thing is going viral. At least for Winnipeg. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Sure, it's awesome to set up a new camera and catch someone > > >>>>> red-handed (or > > >>>>> whatever!), but seriously, we have to put forth a positive public > > >>>>> image. > > >>> This > > >>>>> is especially true now, since we're expected to receive significant > > >>>>> public > > >>>>> funding. OK, it's under Skullspace, but we're team-mates, and we will > > >>>>> both > > >>>>> benefit from Assentworks funding. I don't want to sound paranoid, but > > >>> interest > > >>>>> in this video is taking off. Dried pee on our landing isn't what we > > >>>>> want > > >>>>> people to think of when they hear Skullspace or Assentworks.....! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -TT > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 22:06:28 -0500, Robert Elms wrote > > >>>>>> Maybe Tom has a point. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Tom Tessier [email protected] > > >>>>>> 8:11 PM (1 hour ago) > > >>>>>> to me > > >>>>>> Hi Robert, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I looked at the video of that smooth-operating lady's man and his > > >>>>>> lusty > > >>>>>> female > > >>>>>> sidekick....unbelievable. But shows that security cameras work. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> If it was under Assentworks, I would not want it put up for the > > >>>>>> public to see, as it is pretty bad and can't show us as being the > > >>>>>> classy bunch we are. But even though it's with Scullspace, once > > >>>>>> everyone gets their laughs, shouldn't this be taken down? I doubt > > >>>>>> visitors will appreciate visiting us with dried urine down the > > >>>>>> steps. We may be a "low overhead" place but not "raunchy". My two > > >>>>>> bits. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Of course, if it does go viral, it can be an opportunity to get > > >>> attention. > > >>>>>> But > > >>>>>> it can be the wrong kind if mismanaged. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> What do you think? This will definitely come up in tomorrow's > > >>>>>> meeting! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -Tom > > > _______________________________________________ > > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ _______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
