Face.com On Tuesday, August 21, 2012, Colin Stanners wrote:
> Ron, if only someone could take that picture of the guy's face and > compare it to a huge database of facebook pictures.... > > I doubt we'd find any matches due to the low quality of the screenshot > and different camera angles, not to mention the guy may not even be on > facebook, but at least it's impressive to say we tried. > > > On 8/21/12, Ron <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's a really cool idea! > > > > Ron > > > > On 2012-08-21 14:29, LES.NET (1996) INC. wrote: > >> Expanding on some of the threads below... > >> > >> This might make an interesting news segment.. > >> > >> hackerspace uses readily available technologies to nap perps... > >> > >> might get some tv time out of it, and they may even broadcast the stills > >> of them looking at the camera. > >> > >> > >> > >> On 08/21/2012 09:59 AM, Justin Lacko wrote: > >> > Some of the AssentWorks folks weigh in on posting the urination > >> > video... I think we should make a police report to show due diligence > >> > in this matter and not treat it as low-brow humour as mentioned below > >> > in this email. > >> > > >> > > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> > From: Robert Elms<[email protected]> > >> > Date: 21 August 2012 06:33 > >> > Subject: Fwd: [INFO@AW] Re: Wet spot on stairs (& on our > reputation?) > >> > To: Justin Lacko<[email protected]> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Sorry Justin, I meant to forward these messages to you, too. > >> > Robert > >> > > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> > From: Robert Elms<[email protected]> > >> > Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:07 AM > >> > Subject: Re: [INFO@AW] Re: Wet spot on stairs (& on our reputation?) > >> > To: Michael Legary<[email protected]>, AssentWorks > >> > <[email protected]>, David Bernhardt > >> > <[email protected]>, Colin Stanners<[email protected]>, Tom > >> > Tessier<[email protected]>, AssentWorks INFO Mailing List > >> > <[email protected]> > >> > > >> > > >> > I think that Tom is right, much of the public's perception of us will > >> > be determined by how we handle this offence. Whether we are seen as IT > >> > savvy, responsible citizens, who are using technology to help the > >> > police identify the offenders and thereby discouraging such public > >> > mischief or we are seen merely as irresponsible voyeurs, who are using > >> > this video to seek attention and satisfy our own puerile pleasure, > >> > will be based largely on our behaviour. The question that many people > >> > will be asking is: What did they (Skullspace/AssentWorks members) do > >> > with the video, offer it to the police as evidence or just exploit it > >> > as a source of low-brow entertainment? Has anyone contacted the police > >> > yet? > >> > > >> > Robert > >> > > >> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:28 AM, AssentWorks< > [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> Based on their actions in the video finding the cams and then > leaving, > >> >> I suspect they not be back. However, if we printed their pics and > >> >> posted them on the wall in the lobby, they will be the message. > >> >> > >> >> Sent from my iPad > >> >> > >> >> On 2012-08-21, at 1:16, "Tom Tessier"<[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Here's a suggestion for this to be positive. > >> >>> > >> >>> If it's the police releasing the video looking for "suspects
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
