Exactly, but i am banking on fact that the kind of dude that pee's in a 
stairwell, will fail to make the distinction.

Call me a profiler if you want to.

Sent from my iPhone

On 2012-08-21, at 15:53, "Ron" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Too bad it's only several thousand imaginary Internet dollars, and not
> actual dollars. :)
> 
> Ron
> 
> On 2012-08-21 15:09, Ian E. Trump wrote:
>> I would be happy to print up a couple hundred 8.5 X 11 posters and hit the 
>> Exchange Area, Village and Downtown that say:
>> 
>> $ 150 Finding Fee for anyone that can identify the the two individuals 
>> pictured below:
>> 
>> <Picture>
>> 
>> Their surveillance video has gone viral, and we feel that some of the money 
>> generated from the page hits (numbering several thousand as of 21 Aug 12) 
>> belongs to them.
>> 
>> Help us do what is right and give them what they deserve.
>> 
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> Ian Trump
>> Octopi Managed Services
>> (204) 770 8894
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Stefan penner
>> Sent: Tue 21-Aug-12 14:55
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] Fwd: [INFO@AW] Re: Wet spot on stairs (& 
>> on our reputation?)
>> 
>> 
>> Face.com
>> 
>> On Tuesday, August 21, 2012, Colin Stanners wrote:
>> 
>> Ron, if only someone could take that picture of the guy's face and
>> compare it to a huge database of facebook pictures....
>> 
>> I doubt we'd find any matches due to the low quality of the screenshot
>> and different camera angles, not to mention the guy may not even be on
>> facebook, but at least it's impressive to say we tried.
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/21/12, Ron <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> That's a really cool idea!
>>> 
>>> Ron
>>> 
>>> On 2012-08-21 14:29, LES.NET (1996) INC. wrote:
>>>> Expanding on some of the threads below...
>>>> 
>>>> This might make an interesting news segment..
>>>> 
>>>> hackerspace uses readily available technologies to nap perps...
>>>> 
>>>> might get some tv time out of it, and they may even broadcast the stills
>>>> of them looking at the camera.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 08/21/2012 09:59 AM, Justin Lacko wrote:
>>>>> Some of the AssentWorks folks weigh in on posting the urination
>>>>> video... I think we should make a police report to show due diligence
>>>>> in this matter and not treat it as low-brow humour as mentioned below
>>>>> in this email.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Robert Elms<[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: 21 August 2012 06:33
>>>>> Subject: Fwd: [INFO@AW] Re: Wet spot on stairs (&  on our reputation?)
>>>>> To: Justin Lacko<[email protected]>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry Justin, I meant to forward these messages to you, too.
>>>>> Robert
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Robert Elms<[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:07 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [INFO@AW] Re: Wet spot on stairs (&  on our reputation?)
>>>>> To: Michael Legary<[email protected]>, AssentWorks
>>>>> <[email protected]>, David Bernhardt
>>>>> <[email protected]>, Colin Stanners<[email protected]>, Tom
>>>>> Tessier<[email protected]>, AssentWorks INFO Mailing List
>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think that Tom is right, much of the public's perception of us will
>>>>> be determined by how we handle this offence. Whether we are seen as IT
>>>>> savvy, responsible citizens, who are using technology to help the
>>>>> police identify the offenders and thereby discouraging such public
>>>>> mischief or we are seen merely as irresponsible voyeurs, who are using
>>>>> this video to seek attention and satisfy our own puerile pleasure,
>>>>> will be based largely on our behaviour. The question that many people
>>>>> will be asking is: What did they (Skullspace/AssentWorks members) do
>>>>> with the video, offer it to the police as evidence or just exploit it
>>>>> as a source of low-brow entertainment? Has anyone contacted the police
>>>>> yet?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Robert
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:28 AM, AssentWorks<[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Based on their actions in the video finding the cams and then leaving,
>>>>>> I suspect they not be back. However, if we printed their pics and
>>>>>> posted them on the wall in the lobby, they will be the message.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2012-08-21, at 1:16, "Tom Tessier"<[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Here's a suggestion for this to be positive.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If it's the police releasing the video looking for "suspects
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to