Great work Justin!

Sent from my iPhone

On 2012-10-11, at 11:32, "Justin Lacko" <jus...@takaji.ca> wrote:

> I spoke with Jake @ Remco again today. He says he's going to talk the 
> landlords out of trying to stick us with *any* old bills. Jake agrees it's 
> not fair for them to give them back to us.
> 
> Also the $1k annual deduction may be able to be changed into $100 off our 
> base monthly rent, meaning paying $1400 instead of $1500. This would result 
> in slightly more money for us.
> 
> The lease will be written as a three year lease, with the option to renew for 
> an additional two after the initial three years *at the same terms.* Meaning 
> in effect we have a five year lease, with the option for *us* to leave after 
> three. After three years, the landlord can't renegotiate the terms.
> 
> Jake says he's going to try and have the document ready for us by early next 
> week to sign.
> 
> This is all positive news.
> 
> On 11 October 2012 08:18, Michael Loney <maikerulo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The past electrical bill is 100% on either the owner or Remco. There is no 
> way they can ask us to pay it, even in part.
> 
> G Mike
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Lynn Kendrick <soccer_trek...@yahoo.co.uk> 
> wrote:
> I say we stick with the lease but try to negotiate on the electrical bills 
> they want us to pay for past use.  Even if we can get them down to half that 
> would be better.
> 
> --- On Thu, 11/10/12, Roswyne <rosw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Roswyne <rosw...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] Conclusion of Lease Discussions
> To: discuss@lists.skullspace.ca
> Date: Thursday, 11 October, 2012, 7:41
> 
> 
> I still think the landlord is bullying us.
> 
> They have no legal right to ask us to take on the electrical bill.
> 
> They have the option to invoke the six month clause, but don't have to.
> On Oct 11, 2012 12:41 AM, "chris kluka" <asd...@asdlkf.net> wrote:
> As my final thought for the night:
> 
> We can get cheap, centrally located, or spacious. Pick 2. 
> 
> Our current deal is... well... all 3. Moving is going to suck, and finding 
> anything sub $5/sf/year is almost impossible, especially down town.
> 
> -- Chris
> 
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Jeremy Hiebert <jkhieb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just want to put it out there that RRC has no plans to buy our building... 
> nor the funds.
> 
> On 11 Oct 2012 00:28, "chris kluka" <asd...@asdlkf.net> wrote:
> I'm not advocating any particular option; I'm simply pointing at options.
> 
> Also, its not at all uncommon for developers to subdivide units for any size 
> tenant. It doesn't make any difference to the guy who owns the building if he 
> has 8 tenants with 5000 sq ft each or 1 tenant with 40,000 sq ft, because 
> he's probably paying a property manager to keep the space leased and collect 
> rent. 
> 
> If we leased 2k sf, it wouldn't make the property any more or less attractive 
> to any other prospective tenants looking at 38k sf vs 40k sf, since there is 
> already 2 other tenants with 30k sf and 40k sf. 
> 
> I still obviously think our current deal (even the 20-30% increased price 
> deal) is a hell of a steal, but that could be precluded if we get evicted to 
> give RRC space. 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Justin Lacko <jus...@takaji.ca> wrote:
> On 11 October 2012 00:01, chris kluka <asd...@asdlkf.net> wrote:
> Now, considering 28 foot ceilings, we can make use of the space vertically; 
> Perhaps the developer can put in a mezzanine level or something.
> 
> Respectfully, Chris... but do you think SkullSpace could really ever look 
> into an option like this? That's the kinda discussion you have with someone 
> looking to sign 20 years and pay considerably higher than we are.
> 
> Also pointing out that their proposal of $6.50/sq. ft. is like a 450% 
> increase on our current.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to