Great email, well written and well reasoned.

Worthy of debate.

I believe shinny toys are not a sustainable way to build membership. 

I am fiscal conservative to be sure, and a collection of 3-D printed action 
figures is something I can get behind.

I would like to see us with an electrical system which meets our needs and a 
better financial position.

Ian 

Sent from my iPhone

On 2013-01-24, at 14:19, "Justin Lacko" <[email protected]> wrote:

> The "official" policy of SkullSpace currently is that until we balance our 
> budget, we can't spend on anything except the basics - such as rent and 
> power. This is a fiscally-conservative policy. I believe we need to still 
> have nominal spending while operating at a deficit, for reasons which I will 
> outline below.
> 
> We are currently operating at a deficit. We can pay our bills each month 
> without a problem; we have three months of rent in our coffers. But our 
> monthly income is less than our expenses. The targeted fix for this problem 
> is to increase membership through whatever means available, such as 
> advertising at conventions.
> 
> When I worked on the plan for SkullSpace 2.0, I knew that we had to expand 
> our membership base and ask for more money. Looking back since we moved to 
> the new space at the beginning of December, we certainly have worked on this 
> goal. Lately, it seems membership has again plateaued (I base this 
> observation on the fact that there haven't been any recent emails from 
> Courtney announcing new members). What I want to outline is that we need to 
> continue to work on getting more members if we want to eliminate our deficit.
> 
> I think that our current fiscally-conservative spending policy is not 
> beneficial to the long-term goals of SkullSpace. I believe that right now is 
> the most important time to be investing SkullSpace capital into the space, in 
> creative ways that will bring in new members. The constant reminder of "we 
> can't spend a penny until we break even each month" is not encouraging and 
> dampens any creative thought for how SkullSpace can grow - because sometimes 
> ideas/things need money. I offer the example of our now-defunct monthly $100 
> prize to be awarded to a worthy member-nominated project. While we may not be 
> able to afford $100 monthly now, we could bring it back at $50 each month, or 
> a similar level.
> 
> A basic projection, without knowing exact numbers, is that it will take at 
> least 6 months or more to break even with our income and expenses, with the 
> assumption that membership continues to grow. I don't think that we should 
> wait until this time before spending money. While deficit spending is a 
> hotly-debated issue, it is beneficial as a means of injecting stimulus in 
> order to continue growth in a stagnant economy. The current situation is the 
> funding of a 3D printer for the space - much of which has graciously been 
> funded by the membership. A 3D printer would arguably bring in more members, 
> with the promise of using a novel machine as an added bonus to their 
> membership. A $100 donation from SkullSpace hardly seems harmful, and I think 
> that we are missing an opportunity to contribute to a really good idea.
> 
> I propose that we form a committee to assist with budgetary decisions, as Jay 
> is stepping down at the next election, and make the entire process much more 
> membership-oriented. The job of treasurer for a fledgling organisation is one 
> with many duties, and understandably one person can easily get burnt out with 
> it. I would volunteer to sit on this committee. Currently, our funding 
> decisions are resting with a single person, which is unfair and does not 
> follow the SkullSpace mantra/rule of members having a say in the running of 
> SkullSpace.
> 
> I think that going-forward, SkullSpace is in a good position right now and we 
> are slowly working towards our goal of breaking even and eventually turning a 
> profit. We need to continue to spend where members think it is necessary or 
> else we will surely stagnate.
> 
> Please respond with opinions, criticisms, rebukes, death threats, etc., but 
> I'm hoping to keep this discussion on-topic.
> 
> ~Justin
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to