*"I think participation from more of the group would more effectively show
the true costs of setting up and maintaining the club... And would
encourage a sense of ownership and community among a larger portion of the
membership."*

If I remember correctly, when Justin asked who would be willing to donate
above the $40 per month, back at the old space, the vast majority
volunteered more money. If that isn't exactly what you are saying should
happen than I don't know what is.


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't think it's healthy (financially or emotionally) to rely on
> subsidies from a small number of people.
>
> I think participation from more of the group would more effectively show
> the true costs of setting up and maintaining the club... And would
> encourage a sense of ownership and community among a larger portion of the
> membership.
> On May 17, 2013 4:15 PM, "Ron" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 2013-05-17 15:11, Roswyne wrote:
>> > I dream of the day when the membership as a whole can participate in
>> group
>> > fundraising projects to meet our needs instead of being subsidized by
>> > angels with money to burn.
>> What's wrong with what we're doing, exactly?
>>
>> Ron
>> _______________________________________________
>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to