T wrote:
Especially since they use two different vertical settings for the 'good' and 'bad' signals!
That's not the worst part. I can read a scope display for myself and see that the settings were changed.
The big flaw with this particular measurement (other than the horizontal sweep has been blown up to greatly exaggerate the "problem") is that it shows the jitter at the end of an S/P-DIF link before it has been processed by the receiver chip. The receiver tracks and reconstructs the incoming clock with a phase locked loop that substantially reduces the jitter (noise).
Reducing noise on narrowband signals like clocks and carriers is exactly what phase lock loops *do*; they behave like tunable, very narrowband, high-Q filters that automatically track the signal's frequency.
Sure, it's possible to be sloppy in the design of a PLL. But if you are, chances are it wouldn't work at all. And if it does work, it probably works well.
Again, before any of this is even relevant, one must conduct the properly controlled studies to determine whether clock jitter is even a real, audible problem. I see no evidence that it is.
The ironic thing about this discussion is that the Squeezebox is not s S/P-DIF receiver that has to track an external clock. The Squeezebox requests TCP/IP packets containing audio data, and it plays them at its own pace using its own internal crystal oscillator. While I do not have a schematic of a Squeezebox, I think it quite likely that this same (or another) crystal oscillator also clocks the DACs providing analog audio to the jacks. So there's no S/P-DIF link and no PLL reconstructing clock anywhere in the Squeezebox's audio path. But if you connect an external DAC, perhaps with one of those $500 jitter removers, now you have introduced one or even two "flawed" S/P-DIF links and clock recovery circuits, each adding their own jitter!
So it seems to me that if you're really worried about jitter, just use the analog outputs on the Squeezebox and don't even connect anything to the S/P-DIF outputs!
--Phil
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
