seanadams;408529 Wrote: > What exactly was your mixed mode? Was that G/N only, or B/G/N? There's a > _big_ difference... Mixed mode supporting 'B' backward compatibility > requires a kludgy handshaking mechanism to ensure that the airwaves are > clear when the faster radios want to talk. G/N does not do this, because > the higher rate signalling is encapsulated with a preamble that the G > radios can understand. > > I have personally tested both B/G interoperability, and also G/N. I did > not get the same results as you, and perhaps that gives us something > interesting to discuss now. I apologize for incorrectly assuming that > you hadn't tested it.
definately no B enabled, not to mention B wouldnt support WPA security anyway. perhaps it is a deficiency of my router (and other draft 1 routers?) and not the standard, but regardless since this is the hardware (or firmware?) I have I would like to keep it N if possible. I have several G routers also that I could set up separate networks so its not a huge deal, more just wondering if squeezebox is going to release an N version to make my life easier. it looks to me like there were a couple years between each Squeezebox hardware version, so maybe they dont typically do yearly refreshes? (especially considering since I hear the Duet firmware has been an ongoing development...) -- Evan55 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Evan55's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=27937 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=61579 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
