> Most average joes I know (and I'm one too) don't have or use NASes. > When they do, it's for storage, not for running apps. Has someone really > convinced themselves that this deserves a development focus?
I'm adding a third employee's voice: we've had too many complaints about SC being a memory hog on all platforms (including Windows), and more than enough about issues with MySQL and AV scanners and firewalls. Most of our users will profit from the change. Some more, some less. And a few not at all. > These comments contradict one another - which is it? They don't. If users run into trouble with AV scanners and firewalls blocking access to the DB, then this is a usability issue. Michael _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
