Mnyb wrote: > +1 Other may want it but thatÂ’s why we have server side transcoding , it > works perfectly fine for 192kHz and other oddball formats . the product > will only get more complicated without actually add anything off value > to cater for a fringe interest . > > I would not count anything from computer audiofool as gospel . > > If it can be proven that this a seizable market share I my reconsider my > opinoin if it is needed to move products (even if it does 0 for actual > sound quality ).
"...if it is needed to move products (even if it does 0 for actual sound quality )." is that really the quote the want floating around:) Did you read John's spec for the board? He is not building a 6 layer board with multiple ground plans so that it appeals to the MP3 crowd. Don't kid yourself this thing is not heading down the el cheapo route. It's going to be an audiophile piece and the "computer audiofools" will be the one funding it. Jesus R ------------------------------------------------------------------------ vortecjr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30173 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97881
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
