CatBus;299528 Wrote: > I think what we have here is a disagreement over what "ambiguous" means. > If you've got TPE1 disagreement within an album, I'd say the most > logical assumption is that it's a compilation, unless explicitly marked > otherwise.
well, as i've made clear, SC7 gets this wrong half the time (for me). it is not a logical assumption to make, and i could show you dozens of my own examples and there are literally tens of thousands of more potentially out there. tell me, why should a billy joel box set CD that has ray charles guest on one track (and thus is marked as such on TPE1) be called a VA album by SC7? CatBus;299528 Wrote: > Sounds to me like your real beef is with the inadequacies of the 2.3 > spec. If a file doesn't have any means of unambiguously telling a > music manager whether it's a compilation or not, you should use a > better file. thats a fine opinion for you to have, and its certainly reasonable for you to have it. it however is not reasonable for slim to have it. i am not the only person in this position. its also interesting to note that you aren't defending the Various Artists logic, which is what i am criticizing. rather, you are defneding how SC7 deals with comp tags, which i have no beef with. the problem is the VA logic, and it could be replaced by something much more accurate and fullproof, that i described in my previous post. -- MrSinatra www.LION-Radio.org Using: Squeezebox2 (primary) / SBR (secondary) / SBC - w/SC 7.0.1beta - Win XP Pro SP2 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - D-Link DIR-655 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47297 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
