I think that finishing the personas and epics for the minimum viable user 
profile is a good idea. I've been reading wiki pages so I can begin to 
reorganize and form coherent lines through multiple pages, but what those lines 
look like and the exact working needs to be driven by the audience for those 
documents, hence the importance of personas and epics.

I'd also say, keep braindumping, I know I need that exercise just to get ideas 
out of my head to be able to focus on the task at hand. We don't necessarily 
need to process every braindump and idea in the present, but noting it and 
circling back on it at a later point certainly seems like a viable idea.

Otherwise, focusing on the minimum functionality seems like a good idea as well.

- Mica

On February 17, 2016 8:56:36 PM PST, Aaron Wolf <[email protected]> wrote:
>So, we had this idea of putting everything in a big list and sorting
>it.
>Now that I've started, I think continuing that plan is dumb. Not that
>the process hasn't helped, but I want to shift how we move forward now.
>
>We have a huge list, a few specifically. We have tickets already, we
>have stuff noted. The issue we had relate to needing the top priorities
>clearly identified (but not about having the rest of the
>lower-priorities all sorted by priority) and to clarifying the
>motivations for each issue so that the details could be determined
>clearly by everyone involved.
>
>For example, we know that making the how-it-works introductory material
>effective and complete is a high priority. The trouble came from having
>the tasks be "let's say X" or an illustration made or a wording
>proposed
>without having a consensus on how to evaluate each proposal.
>
>So, now we have some personas:
>http://shovel.snowdrift.coop/projects/snowdrift/wiki/Personas_for_user_stories
>
>And I started writing out user stories to sort:
>http://flurry.snowdrift.coop:2040/shared/bWJqTz9yLHJbuj7W1FMd28_QfJBt3MaW7J4uyt8oxh5
>
>And I think continuing in this direction is good. So, we can think
>about
>personas coming to see the how-it-works stuff and think more about why
>it needs to have certain elements. We should take this priority item
>and
>figure out in Open Project how to finalize some stories around what the
>how-it-works pages should accomplish. Then we can figure out the
>minimum
>needed to accomplish the issues, and we should better figure out how to
>evaluate each decision.
>
>Using that example, it's clear that the how-it-works pages could be
>really long because there's so much to say. But we need them to be
>concise and get people to actually read them and get the idea as
>quickly
>as possible. The questions are: what ideas are essential? What level of
>vagueness is acceptable initially around what? And user stories can
>help
>us think through this. Open Project organizing should, hopefully, have
>ways for us to separate all the steps needed.
>
>So, here's how I see going forward: we start with things we *know* to
>be
>high priority. We work through our new process with those items. Among
>high-priority items, we can use the functions in Open Project to
>sometimes say "oh, this new item is highest priority really" or "this
>is
>high but lower than that other item". But we only need to do this with
>clearly high priority items. We can all agree to prioritize things
>according to what's in Open Project, and anything else still might
>happen spontaneously but mostly won't be a focus.
>
>I'd like to get started ASAP. I want help from those with thoughts or
>guidance about each step of taking known items (let's go with
>how-it-works pages as the first example) and eventually having a
>totally
>organized way to identify all the appropriate stories and tasks in Open
>Project.
>
>Best,
>Aaron
>-- 
>Aaron Wolf
>co-founder, Snowdrift.coop
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to