My opinion (an and only my opinion) now is that there has been significant discussion on this topic. I would argue that to spare everyone's inbox, it's now the board's responsibility to react with proposals that are sensitive to the dialogue.
The board has been meeting weekly (until this week) to get much of our affairs in order. This discussion is clearly their responsibility to address as offered by our governance bylaws. If you agree, then the path forward would be to give the board a little time to address this and propose a policy. This would also mean it would be most productive to address pressing concerns on this matter to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> or await a blog post that announces some policy. Full disclosure - trying to end my day with an inbox with less than 100 unread emails. Again, just speaking for myself and open to correction if I've done so inappropriately - Jason PS saying this not to be rude, but because I like the sentence in English: "if you agree, skip the irony and *don't* reply." Jason Williams Lead - iPlant Collaborative Education, Outreach, and Training DNA Learning Center Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 1 Bungtown Rd<x-apple-data-detectors://0/0> Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724<x-apple-data-detectors://0/0> 516-367-5186<tel:516-367-5186> www.dnalc.org<http://www.dnalc.org/> _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
