Whose back-biting? I simply said as you said that it is this person's choice. sory if it seemed belittling, but I know I am not this individual so was just trying to answer the question too.
Karen

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Dennis Freedman wrote:

Can we please again stop the back-biting? Back on list and again wondering if I should be. Getting back to the original question: If you can get to a Mac store or see a friend's Imac or even mini, you may see the attractiveness in outward design that is so cool about a Mac as opposed to the PC. It's the feel of the machine, its space-saving physical design, it's 'cool' look. It's a bit like I guess the difference between getting a Merc and a bog-standard car of the cheapest production line. But it's your choice. I tend to agree that unless you're already used to building mnachines it would be safer, if less rewarding from that standpoint, to buy a ready-made new machine.

On 29 Apr 2006, at 22:05, Karen Lewellen wrote:

Granted, what personally interest you is unimportant as you are not the person seeking the information. However you did make a better stab at answering the question. upgrading the processor does not a new mac make, nor does it apparently make for building one of course. Personally there is nothing wrong with running os 9 if it suits your purposes, vo does not run with what I use the mac for, so for me os 9 is just fine, and I personally think 512 meg of memory is more than baseless. This is me, however and I would not project my interests onto this person, nor diminish their goals as I am not them. It is their time after all?

Karen

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, BlindTech of BlindTechs.Net wrote:

> because when you upgrade an old mac, you only upgrade the processor or > ram, or maybe, pci cards. big deal. I to, have torn down, did magic > tricks and rebuilt a pc, for a living mind you and you donb't see me > wripping my mac a part to see if I could do it. it just doesn't interest > me. > > As mac users we know the reason why mac os and mac hw run so well is > because they were written for each other. now, if he is so pressed on > running a mac on a pc, then why not go get osm 9 and baseless rom and a > couple of other items and have a litteral mac on your indows pc???
> BlindTech of BlindTechs.Net
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> website: http://blindtechs.net
> Visit our website where we offer free email, shell accounts, shoutcast > radio service, online games and more!
> Powered by Unix not Microsoft
> > > On Apr 29, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote: > > > In an effort to add something educational here, what is the difference > > between what he is suggesting, and say upgrading an older mac to a > > newer one? Others have done this on this list or have referenced as > > much. > > building a pc from parts is not uncommon, so I can understand the > > spirit of the goal, but not why the idea is such an odd one where macs > > are concerned?
> > Just wondering,
> > Karen
> > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, David Poehlman wrote:
> > > You might save 200 dollars or so, but what about that warranty? > > > What > about all the time and effort? Sheesh, oh, and you have to > > > buy the us.
> > > >  On Apr 29, 2006, at 2:42 PM, hank wrote:
> > > > hello I was looking around on the osx86project.org site and it > > > > mentioned > building a mac pc out of intel parts.
> > >  1. there any one doing this currently?
> > > 2. if this is possible, would it run tiger, or would I have to > > > result to > using hacked version of osx? > > > am trying to find out the cheapest way to get my mac legally > > > oviously > > > if I can build my own using parts, then purchase tiger I would be > > > saving > 200 bucks or so.
> > >  let me know
> > >  thanks
> > >  hank
> > > > > >



________________________________________________________________
Did you know! This message could have been secured by the TFT BBS Digital Security Initiative. To secure
future messages from this sender, please click this link:

https://keys.tft-bbs.co.uk:10040/b/b.e?r=Discuss%40macvisionaries.com&n=kRp%2BKwUcsrHLnGdLA%2FpTTg%3D%3D



Reply via email to