Will - Which screen reader are you using in Windows? I just tested the last few versions of the utility with Window-eyes and had absolutely no joy, but Jaws seems way happier with this one out of the box. Unusual, but there it is. If you've got jfw at your disposal, break it out and have a tinker, the newest version of the utility is slightly more accessible than the last.
But to bring this back on topic, it sucks that it's not accessible on mac. Anyone know whether it's usable on any other OS's? I'm thinking of dropping the developers a note or perhaps chatting to them about it on irc. On 10/8/08, Scott Chesworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris - What's equally worrying is that I checked how you spelled it > and thought about how i'd have done it for quite a while lol. I'm > sure you already know how your nano works by syncing little voiceclips > for each file? Rockbox can work in the same way, Apple is jumping on > the wagon pretty late on this one because I'm fairly sure the rockbox > team weren't even the first people to have the idea. Anyway, the > spelling option is there as a backup for when you haven't generated > those clips, I wondered, does the new nano have a similar feature? I > guess what I'm asking is, what happens if you manually add content? > Do voiceclips or whatever Apple calls them get generated as part of > the process, or do you get the files spelled out, or just get > unnerving silences on those tracks? > > Keep rockin the Mary Poppins... > Scott > > On 10/8/08, Will Lomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> hi i cant even use it under windows no buttons no labels or anything. >> it is totally inaccessible to me this utility >> >> On 8 Oct 2008, at 18:30, Scott Chesworth wrote: >> >>> Yep, rockbox user here on a 1st gen nano. This is bad news! If it's >>> any conselation, it's usable under Windows if you don't mind a bit of >>> guess work now and then. Hmmm, I think the code for the app is being >>> maintained across several OS's, but still, big shame. >>> >>> voice files and talk clips have been around for a long time, they >>> built that functionality in to the utility, seems daft that the >>> functionality is there for us in a utility that we can't use. Maybe >>> they're just not aware that we can't use it yet. I wouldn't know, I'm >>> not on any rockbox mailing lists etc. >>> >>> Anyone think it's worth a note to the developers and have the best >>> addresses to use? >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> On 10/8/08, Will Lomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> hi does anyone use rockbox on an IPod or similar device? >>>> the new rock box utility is totally inaccessible to voice over >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >
