comparing fusion and parallels

[Mike Arrigo]

Hi everyone. Well, I am playing with a trial of fusion, and have  
Windows XP running quite well. The defaults worked fine, though I did  
take the memory down a bit, around 300 MB. Anyway, for those who have  
tried fusion and parallels, which do you like better? I remember  
hearing from several people that fusion was better, does parallels  
offer any advantages? I'm not even sure if I am going to purchase  
either one yet, just exploring options. Actually, I would rather run  
windows using boot camp, since all of the mac resources are then  
devoted to running windows, but there is no way to install windows  
without sighted help that way.