Rich wrote: > oh. i just hate when extension is not shown ;) > btw, oo.org does not show extension when opening a .doc file. is this > intentional ? > > also, i managed today with m104 achieve a situation by closing/opening > doc/odt files all the time that also odt extension was not shown, so i > had two windows with same title (except <2> added). > > that surely seems to be bug, but i can't reproduce it now :)
Both are bugs. Extensions should be shown always, a possible alternative is showing them only if the operation systems doesn't have an option not to do so that is set. Windows per default doesn't show extensions (in Explorer etc.), so it's an option to respect this setting. >> 2) What is the point of the title property if it isn't displayed? > > if properly used it could be useful part of document management systems. That's a good point, maybe this is more convenient than the file name, I'm not sure. In general having title and file name looks redundant to me. OK, file names don't allow every character (at least on Windows, on Linux or Unix only a slash is illegal IIRC), but that's bearable IMHO. I don't argue against having a title property, I'm only pointing out that for end users a file name is enough. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
