On Fri, September 23, 2005 01:30, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> >> It's absolutely no use to contemplate wondrous document constructions if >> you don't solve the distribution problem of the bricks (separate >> documents) you need. Even if users were interested in wondrous document >> constructions in the first place (MS Works market failure seems to >> indicate they aren't).
> Again I wonder what you mean from separating content. Where did I wrote about separating content ? You wrote about master documents as a way to improve OO.o collaborative capabilities (Meaning separate parts created by separate persons would be combined in a single document. With the separate parts coming potentially from different apps in the office suite) I answered you you need to tackle the distribution problem of these separate parts before you start thinking of the many ways you could put them together. And that all the compound document types I knew where used by users not for their integration properties but to distribute a bunch of related files together. Because the distribution problem is much more important for your average user. It's no use being able to integrate many different parts if you have to fish all those parts every month/week/day from your mailbox. And wonder which version your team members sent you is the last one. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
