Probably, I dont understant, and you dont understand me ... I am using opensource alternatives ( Evolution/Kontact ), BUT how can so "called" promoters of OOo expect to use it widely, if it has not the same "components" as its competitor, and even MORE? I mean MS office. And who said, there can not be made a better mail/PIM application than Evolution, Kontact, Thunderbird or whatever ? ? ? They are NOT far as flawless as it is claimed to be ! Please, reply my post, if you still dont understant my point. Have a nice day all :)
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:20 +1000, Daniel Kasak wrote: > Jozef Peterka wrote: > > Indeed, > > Daniel, this is what I was writing about ! You wrote about options, but the > > option for OOo users is to have mail/PIM program in their suite, they can > > be > > proud of using ! I repeat ! Dont you think that OOo users already know > > alternatives but still I and the others are not looking for an opensource > > alternative ! they want to have OpenOffice.org Mailer or whatever it could > > be > > named ... as a part of their OOo suite ! > > I know exactly what you're asking for. Many others have asked for it. > All have a basic lack of understanding on how open-source works. If > there is a perfectly good alternative ( ie Thunderbird, Evolution ), > then why should developers code another client ... just so you can click > an OpenOffice icon instead of a different icon? Why not change > Evolution's icon to look like an OpenOffice icon? The mind boggles why > people insist on having EVERYTHING encapsulated inside 1 application. > It's a mental constraint you have to get over before you can make the > best use of open-source software that's available. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
