Anyway you could batch convert your fonts into freetype, I think that will bee the quickest solution. remember there is a FontOOo wizard that allows you to install new typeface into the OOo environment/ I am not very familiar with it since I dont care much about typefaces. But this will be one of the very first think I wil think into solving the problem.

Again I dont see this as a showstopper, since my use of openoffice.org is less about document production.

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:28:04 -0600, George Morten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello,

Likewise, I have not been involved in any discussions about either OO or NO.

Once I found out about NO, however, I downloaded and installed it to find out whether the fonts menu would find my active fonts, which are maintained by a third-party application -- Suitcase Fusion. Indeed, NO listed every font correctly, something OO could not do -- it listed ONLY the active fonts in the various system font folders.

This is an important issue for me, since I run a small part-time design service, and need access to any of several thousand typefaces that are maintained in Suitcase. Since OO needs to run a conversion -- which, if I read the instructions correctly, deals only with TT fonts -- on fonts located any/some where on your computer, this is simply not going to work for me. (None of my fonts are located on the computer, since I opted to install them all directly into Suitcase's Vault).

I'm not saying NO is the perfect solution, only that it seems to be many steps ahead of OO in how it handles fonts on the Mac. The basic font-handling approach of OO seems to mimic that of old MS DOS applications in that each application "loaded" fonts into its own handler, a real step backwards to anyone who deals with lots of fonts, with fonts that must be activated and deactivated, etc.

I will look forward to seeing what the next version of OO does regarding X11, a clunky and non Mac-like way to run programs. Perhaps better font handling will be part of the package.

George


On Mar 22, 2007, at 08:36 AM, Chad Smith wrote:

On 3/22/07, Guy Voets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello

We just had a discussion on the users list here about the NeoOffice
fork...
after which it sounds a bit false to simply sing the praises of the
latter.



I was not involved in your discussion. If I were, I would be on the pro-Neo
side, as I have been for years.

For years, the "very enthusiastic" (sic) Mac port team has done a lot of
talking with zero results.

Whenever a true Mac-Native Aqua port of OpenOffice.org (tm) without X11
becomes available, I'll use it, and I will tell the world to use it. Until
that day, I will use and promote NeoOffice.  If someone goes through the
hell to install X11, digging out the Tiger install discs that most users
have never opened, much less used, or finding the download on some obsecure
page for 10.3 users, (which, searching for a download is the first thing
most people do when having to install something weird - not digging out the
CDs/DVDs that came with your computer)....

Why should users have to do nay of that?  NeoOffice has been offering
Mac-Nativity for at least 4 years that I am personally aware of - probably longer than that. Why can 2 guys in their spare time do 4 years ago what the entire of OpenOffice.org and Sun Microsystems hasn't been able to do in
as many years with full time employees?

Look at the download page. Has anyone from Sun or OOo looked at it on a Mac
looked at it?

I did.  Here's what I saw.

http://chad78.justfree.com/Port2Mac/OOo4Mac.html

Just a tip - when making a page for Mac users - don't test view it on
Windows IE.


Whatever may be the history of relations between developers of OOo and NO, I

can't say that I'm all that pleased with the so-called advantages of NO
over
OOo. The 'native' character is little more than a distance of a few cm
between the location of the top level menu. The all-over look and feel is
not really what I as a Mac-user would call Aqua, and in the fast
development
of OOo, NO is lagging behind several versions.
I'm looking forward to the native OOo version for Mac that will probably
toll the bell for this rather unfortunate spin-off product.

I'd advise avery Mac user to go through the motions of installing X11
(that
are really peanuts, you only need to take a look at the install how-to)
and
maybe try to contribute to a swift transition to the Aqua OOo by reporting

bugs, problems and possible solutions to the very small but enthusiastic
Mac
porting team.

Enjoy!
--
Guy
using dutch OOo 2.2 RC 3 on a iMac Intel DualCore Tiger
and dutch OOo 2.2 RC 3 on a G4 PPC Powerbook Tiger
-- please reply only to [email protected] --
Dodoes can't afford to have headaches




--- Chad Smith
http://www.chadwsmith.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Alexandro Colorado
Grupo de Usuarios Linux Tabasco
http://www.gultab.org

OpenOffice.org
Community Contact // Mexico
http://www.openoffice.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to