Benjamin Huot wrote:

> I can respect it. If they don't have the code ready for prime time,  
> then why be negative on NeoOffice. 
Please explain where in this thread somebody is negative on NeoOffice.
So far I can only see that some deficiences and risks have been
mentioned. That's valid criticism and it's more or less the same as we
talked about bugs or missing features in OOo. If people send me bug
reports I don't accuse them of being negative. Why should you do that
because I talk about the undeniable problems of NeoOffice?

You could do that if I (or somebody else) had written "don't use the
NeoOffice crap". But I doubt that you can show me a quote of this.

Ciao,
Mathias

-- 
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to