You have a point there Thorstein. We should have conducted our think tank efforts separately under the appropriate carboard boxes.
Cheers your self, by yourself, with yourself. ----- Original Message ----- From: Thorsten Behrens To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:02 PM Subject: Re: [discuss] Performance project - becoming an incubator project On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:49:31PM +0100, Dieter Loeschky wrote: > MISSION STATEMENT > > The goal of the performance project is to analyze the status of > OpenOffice.org performance and identify areas where the performance is > not sufficient. Members of the project will improve the performance in > these areas, and setup a system to monitor performance continuously. > and on Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:22:29PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: > Since I'm already working on Calc performance and performance in > general was and is a major topic, this project of course gets my > While I definitely applaud all efforts spend improving performance of OOo, I see serious overlap in scope with existing projects. Also, I believe calc performance issues should be discussed on the calc dev list, impress issues on the graphics list etc. - or, if they are of generic character, on the main dev list; and not on a dedicated d...@performance list. As exemplified by Eike's post, probably the core developers of the respective projects will do the actual performance improvement work anyway (or at least will need to be consulted). Ultimately, I believe development work is already fragmented enough with the existing number of projects, so I'd suggest stripping down the scope to measuring performance (as QA-ing performance again seriously overlaps with the QA project). Cheers, -- Thorsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
