On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 21:00:51 PM -0400, Twayne wrote:
> OK, one more time:
> 
> M. Fioretti wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 15:28:26 PM -0400, Twayne wrote:
> >> X-No-Archive: Yes
> >
> > Twayne,
> >
> > was it you that introduced this No-Archive header? If so, it doesn't
> > work:
> > http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=discuss&msgNo=64448
> 
> Oh, it works. Obviously you don't know what it means though, as the link 
> you provide has absolutely nothing to do with it.

As it's evident from the headers of all your messages (viewable by
clicking on "Raw display" on the page mentioned above) you are
using/accessing this forum as if it were an NNTP newsgroup, via
gmane.org

The X-No-Archive header is an NNTP newsgroup message header field used
to prevent a Usenet message from being archived in various servers.

Gmane (see http://gmane.org/expiry.php) does honor that header, even
if reminds users that it is obsolescent. Therefore, it should delete
from http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.openoffice.general all messages
containing that header 14 days after they're posted.

But [email protected] was born and still is also/primarily a
mailing list: a public discussion group run with software that
couldn't care less about NNTP headers. Gmane and newsgroup readers are
just an additional way to reach that mailing list. Therefore, the
public mailing list archives created by that mailing list software
(AND all the public mirrors of those archives created by independent
third parties on the Internet).

So, even if that message of yours will be canceled by
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.openoffice.general after April 25,
almost surely it will remain online forever, together with all your
other contributions to this community, at the URL I provided and any
of its mirrors. :-)

My understanding, since you are "seeing" this forum as an NNTP
newsgroup, was that you are adding that header as a request to the
NNTP server to remove your messages from public archives after 14
days, so I just pointed out that it won't work in this case. Sorry if
this wasn't the case.

The explanation above is still useful as general reference, of course.

Have a nice day :-)

Marco Fioretti
-- 
Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how
software is used *around* you:            http://digifreedom.net/node/84

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to