Sounds like you're having a bad day!  Some thoughts inline:

M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 13:22:25 PM -0400, Twayne wrote:
>
>> Right. When sending documents, if the recipient's capabilities are
>> known, the sender should try to accomodate.
>
> Why propagate a virus? Because that is what sending out files in
> proprietary formats amounts to. Of course, there are a lot of cases
> when it is simply impossible to make recipients acknowledge that they
> are perpetuating a disease and change their ways, so the sender has no
> other choice than try to accomodate. But it shouldn't happen unless
> one has tried to do things right or knows FOR SURE, in advance, that
> there is no hope. One of such cases is at the bottom.

Off base: Recommendation was,  The Sender doing the accomodating is 
exactly the opposite: Sending files in formats the other end CAN read.
   ANY file going by attachment might be dangerous if it's unexpected 
and the source unknown. I routinely accept attachments from people I 
know when they advise me when they will be coming; otherwise I simply 
contact them first to see if they actually sent it.  That end of the 
subject context is irrelevant and up to the communicators to handle. 
I'm at a loss to understand your whole paragraph.

>
>> It's better for one person to make mods than for possibly several to
>> accomodate the one.
>
> very wise words in general, not in this specific case. This is exactly
> the attitude that allowed Microsoft to lock everybody in (even if yes,
> I do know that there is no choice in many practical cases, it's just
> that one should know exactly what the problem is).

Nonsense.  When I communicate with more than one person it's much better 
for ME to make the accomodations for THEM, period, in any case I can 
imagine or have ever come across.  It has nothing to do with MS or any 
entity other than the two parties involved.

>
>>   In additon, SUN also provides an add-in for MS Office that will
>> allow Word to open Writer documents to work on them.  I find it
>> curious no one mentioned it.
>
> "we wanted to send ODF files only, but the MS Office plugins for MS
> Office are only available for the newest version of that suite; almost
> all our correspondants have oldest versions (some still run Office 97)
> so we have to stick to .doc for now..."

1.  A practical person wishing to keep good communications/relationships 
will never push a new program or new technology on any other group.  If 
I received a response from you in a format I couldn't accomodate, I 
would ask you to provide a format I CAN read. If you can't and the only 
alternative you surprise me with is to install a new suite of programs, 
it will be the end of our communications. You don't force things on 
anyone that you want a good relationship with.

  It's unreasonable and silly to expect that everyone you come in 
contact with is going to even have had the time to install/learn a new 
program, let alone whether they want to or have even ever heard of it 
before.  And especially if you're in a one to many conversation it is 
about 99.99% likely to end the communication.

2.  Whoever told you the SUN ODF plug in will only work in the "newest" 
version lied to you, you misunderstood them, or they mis-spoke.  That is 
a patently false statement as it will run on office 2000, 2002 and 2003. 
You should visit the site, test it out, and teach that teacher; he's 
lousy at his job if you stated it correctly.

3.  I cannot help that your contacts are the "oldest" versions. All that 
says is that YOU should be accommodating THEM and as a sidelight 
educating them about the possibilities of OO.o, NOT trying to force it 
on them.

>
> this is what a Public Administration officer told me at this
> conference just one week ago:
>
> http://mfioretti.com/feltre-file-formats-and-pluralism-ict

I can't help what misinformation you may have gotten from a PAO but 
perhaps you need to consider their credibility and learn to do 
clarification/verification searches of your own on such information as 
most would do.  No, I didn't follow your link and have no intention of 
doing so.  No reason to.

HTH,

Twayne



>
> Ciao,
> Marco F.





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to