Twayne wrote:
"Lars Nooden" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
Robin Laing wrote:
Do you have RFE's or Bug numbers for reference? If they are not
reported, they cannot/will not be fixed.
@Twayne:
The UI for the bug reporter is absolutely tedious. However, even
though it's in the way, it's what's there. Most, if not all, of
these bugs have been reported and if you find and post the URL for
the bugs, then it's much easier for list members to add their vote
and comments.
Regards
/Lars
I agree with your Lars, and also with Robin. In the beginning I tried
to work "within" the system for exactly that purpose. But I think
"culture" and syntax got in the way a lot. No matter how hard I
searched and looked, my entries always came back as "duplicates" or
"already fixed" with neither being the case IMO. And once that
happened, getting anyone to re-look at them was fruitless - no matter
how well I tried to explain further for clarification and verification.
When I finally got a response back that I didn't need to write a book
about it, just state the problem, I quit! And I'm still quit.
My list of "problems" was meant to be a sampling, also. Even if I
did decide to enter them, I wouldn't have time to do so. The system
just doesn't work for me. I've given up on it other than to
occasionally give my opinions here.
Regards,
Twayne`
For ordinary users, the currant bug reporting system is worse than
worthless! I would suspect that 95% + just give up and never try to
report any bugs using it. If we don't toss it and replace it with
something totally different, the only way we will ever get a working bug
reporting system is to place a group of people between the ordinary
users and the bug reporting system.
