As far as reimbursement and membership credit I have submitted them.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Justin Herman <[email protected]> wrote: > My question is why no other options viable for hosting? > > Why MUST we use AWS? Why do we need 99.99 availability for 6 servers? Why > could we not hybrid the design (like Craig said) and use some local hosting > and some AWS? > > Hardware is cheap and easy to come by. Hosting our own allows us to have a > TON more CPU and RAM and storage. It something like spiff/wiki/fileserver > due to hardware failure, upgrade needs, network connection... we could > always but a static page for our contact info so it doesn't seem like we > fell off the face of the internet. > > If we want to have a class on AWS by all means fire up a demo site. That > has nothing to do with our production infrastructure. > > I know we all want more internet and lots of people SAY TWC is unreliable > but I haven't seen anything saying HOW unreliable at the 48 Summit space it > is. Are we down or frequent outages? Not getting promised service <BW>? > Excessive packet loss? Are we taking metrics? > > And if TWC is that bad WHY was it chosen to use them? > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Craig Bergdorf <[email protected]> wrote: > >> or, if it's $200 and you know for a fact the space needs it right now, >> just grudgingly buy it and hold mild anger towards those that said it >> wasn't needed (sorry, in a mood). Unless (crosses fingers) this is meant >> as a way to test a new, functional system for the space approving >> purchases, if so: >> >> Is there a budget for the space that includes consumables like toilet >> paper that any member is allowed to see / comment on? What percentage of >> the remainder of that does this $200 represent? >> >> As I mentioned before, I think this is a great idea, and the lower price >> tag just makes it better. I also have mentioned we should be paying more >> for internet so we can supplement our real host with some old fashioned >> house file servers (and a webcam/open sign/phone that doesn't require so >> much maintenance). >> >> If a call for comments is up, my only concern is one of not knowing if >> the amount we have for monthly improvements has included all the >> consumables I would think higher priority (such as toilet paper). I am >> also surprised that there is a penny left in this fund after 2 months of >> building. >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Torrie Fischer <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> On Monday, March 03, 2014 11:35:51 Justin Herman wrote: >>> > I agree with Andrew, >>> > >>> > I hold several concerns about this proposal and think we need to >>> evaluate >>> > the needs of the infrastructure. >>> >>> If you've got "several concerns", what are those concerns? I too can >>> claim to >>> be "concerned" about something and not actually say why. >>> >>> Instead of doing any useful synhak work today or tomorrow, I'll be >>> producing a >>> technical report that shows why this investment will benefit the hacker >>> community we aim to support. >>> >>> > >>> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Buczko >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> > > WAT? >>> > > >>> > > first you said it was $1.60 >>> > > Then $16.40 >>> > > Now it's $123.10 >>> > > >>> > > ? >>> > > >>> > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Torrie Fischer >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> > >> Previous thread: >>> > >> >>> > >> https://synhak.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-February/003393.html >>> > >> >>> > >> I'd like to propose that we spend $200 to reserve the two t1.micro >>> > >> instances >>> > >> in that proposal for the purpose of web servers. >>> > >> >>> > >> Our current AWS expenditure is still ~$80/mo. Spending $200 up >>> front will >>> > >> reduce that bill by $16.40/mo and keep our infrastructure expenses >>> low >>> > >> for the >>> > >> next three years. Thats an extra $16.40 we can invest elsewhere >>> with a >>> > >> break >>> > >> even point of 12 months. >>> > >> _______________________________________________ >>> > >> Discuss mailing list >>> > >> [email protected] >>> > >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > Discuss mailing list >>> > > [email protected] >>> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
