At last nights meeting it seemed pretty clear to everyone but you as to how we vote on proposals. When I say everyone else, that was demonstrated by a show of hands, minus 3 people: yourself and two members that abstained from comenting. I don't want to get into a long email string of bickering, but I have to state that what you proposed as to how we've been operating seems quite different than what I've witnessed in the short time I've been a member. Can anyone else provide some clarity on this for me?
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Torrie Fischer <[email protected]>wrote: > At last night's meeting, it became pretty apparent that it isn't clear if > we > use Consensus with blocking or voting to decide on proposals. > > Here's what the Unified SYNHAK Code says about it: > > You need to be at the deciding meeting to block consensus or otherwise > contribute to the decision. (Meeting, 2013-01-01) > -- https://synhak.org/wiki/Unified_SYNHAK_Code#Section_2:_Proposals > > Looking back at the meeting minutes for January 1st, 2013, it even verifies > that we're adopting that process: > > https://synhak.org/wiki/Meetings/2013-01-01 > > So, yeah, sorry. We don't use voting. We use consensus and always have. > I've > added the {{Banner_policy}} tag to reflect that. Not reading the wiki > isn't an > excuse for making up statements about how we govern ourselves. > > A friendly reminder that the USC is meant to be the comprehensive > documentation about what we've consensed upon at the space. <3 > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
