There are SOME situations where they can be a problem..if you have a single 
sign on type of interface for several applications and users can open new 
browser windows and *expect* to be able to go directly to another one of their 
secured apps, the sessions won't exist in the new browser and may cause 
problems.  I'm sure there are workarounds, but I thought I'd throw that out 
there.  The J2EE sessions are browser specific so opening a fresh browser will 
essentially disassociate the CF session with the new browser window.  

Allen

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dean H. Saxe
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 1:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Session variables


The J2EE session tokens have more entropy, which is always a good  
thing.  I too see no reason to use the old ones.


Dean H. Saxe, CISSP, CEH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Dissent is the purest form of patriotism."
     --Thomas Jefferson


On Aug 29, 2007, at 12:55 PM, shawn gorrell wrote:

> I guess I don't know why anyone would use the old session variables  
> anymore. I always use the J2EE session variables instead. Maybe  
> someone can enlighten me to the any benefits or trade-offs of  
> either choice.
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Charlie Arehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 11:51:46 AM
> Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Session variables
>
> Just to clarify, this isn't something you can do at the application  
> level in CF8. I was under the impression myself for a while that we  
> could do pretty much everything at the app level now, but it's just  
> mappings and custom tag paths. Perhaps in a later release. :-)
>
> So, no, the J2EE sessions mechanism is a one for all and all for  
> one sort of thing (unless of course one runs on Enterprise and  
> creates another instance).
>
> /charlie
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas  
> Knudsen
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 9:30 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Session variables
>
> well...if your on CF8 I believe you can set this at the application  
> level.  Aside from that, what is breaking?  In the past I had  
> several apps running on a server with standard cf session vars and  
> turned 'use J2EE session vars' on without incident.
>
> DK
>
> On 8/29/07, Fennell, Mark P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greetings,
> Is is possible to use J2EE session variables in one CFApplication and
> standard session variables in another?
> I have a server that is running two cfapplications and one uses J2EE
> variables and seems to not work so well when J2EE Sess Vars is  
> disabled
> in cf admin. The other applications totally breaks if I have J2EE
> enabled. I was hoping that, before I set about actually fixing the
> problem with code that there might be some setting in the  
> cfapplication
> tag that I can use to enable/disable j2ee vars for a specific
> application... I'm completely prepared to recode, I just wanted to  
> check
> and see if anyone had an easy way out. Thanks.
> mf
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> http://www.acfug.org?falogin.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Douglas Knudsen
> http://www.cubicleman.com
> this is my signature, like it?
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Annual Sponsor - Figleaf Software
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by FusionLink
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Annual Sponsor - Figleaf Software
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by FusionLink
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Annual Sponsor - Figleaf Software
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by FusionLink
> -------------------------------------------------------------



-------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com

To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-------------------------------------------------------------





-------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com

To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to