Awesome! Thanks Charlie. For the record I am not one that has a problem with 
your verbose emails. I even read them all the way to the end. Heaven forbid! 
Reading skills FTW!

----- Original Message ----
From: Charlie Arehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 1:47:00 PM
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Session variables



 
DIV {
MARGIN:0px;}



Shawn, I started to offer some of that info but thought 
twice (some say my emails are too long) so I removed it. So since you're 
asking...:-)

 

If folks don't mind I'd rather point to some blog entries I 
did back in 2002 where I discussed the pros and cons of the J2EE sessions. I 
know you're asking why anyone would stick with the old form, but really, others 
may equally ask why they should switch to the new. Or they may have tried and 
had problems (which does go to your question)

 

In the entries, I explain the differences and even at least 
one gotcha (relatively rare) in using them that I don't think has been 
resolved.

 

http://cfmxplus.blogspot.com/2002/06/j2ee-session-variables-i-mentioned-in.html

http://cfmxplus.blogspot.com/2002/09/updates-on-problems-with-j2ee-sessions.html

 

FWIW, 
I also did a CFDJ article around the same time with some of the same info, 
perhaps arranged differently:

 

http://cfdj.sys-con.com/read/41646.htm 

And I shared some of what I added in the blog entries 
in the "feedback" area of the article as 
well: http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/read/41646_f.htm. 
Just haven't reviewed that info for a while to see if the article and comments 
or the blog entries have all the same info, or which would be more 
authoritative 
of what I'd observed.)

 

Hope 
it's helpful.

 

/charlie

 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of shawn gorrell
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 
12:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ACFUG 
Discuss] Session variables






I guess I 
don't know why anyone would use the old session variables anymore. I always use 
the J2EE session variables instead. Maybe someone can enlighten me to the any 
benefits or trade-offs of either choice. 


----- 
Original Message ----
From: Charlie Arehart 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, 
August 29, 2007 11:51:46 AM
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Session 
variables


Just to clarify, this isn't something you can do at the 
application level in CF8. I was under the impression myself for a while that we 
could do pretty much everything at the app level now, but it's just mappings 
and 
custom tag paths. Perhaps in a later release. :-)

 

So, 
no, the J2EE sessions mechanism is a one for all and all for one sort of thing 
(unless of course one runs on Enterprise and creates another instance). 


 

/charlie




-------------------------------------------------------------


Annual Sponsor - Figleaf Software





To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 


http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform





For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists


Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/


List hosted by FusionLink


-------------------------------------------------------------








-------------------------------------------------------------

Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com



To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 

http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform



For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists

Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/

List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com

-------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to