On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, John Crisp wrote: > On 15/01/13 20:00, Charlie Brady wrote: > > > > [Apologies to those who aren't interested in development environment > > topics.] > > It's not that I am not interested, as I think you are well aware. It's a > very interesting point that should be discussed, at the right time, and > in the right place.
Because Shad is very busy, and also because he prefers instant messaging and Skype, and I choose not to use those media, it's hard to get his attention to discuss development processes via email. I strike while the iron is hot. > But this wasn't the topic, or forum to post it in (assuming it's a > development issue.....) > > devinfo Server Development Discussion > discussion Discussion about project organisation and overall direction Development methodology is a project organisation issue. > And point scoring isn't going to resolve the more fundamental question > that I posed. I don't know how I can debate a technical issue without you considering it point scoring. I believe that Shad is risking a root compromise when he delegates the process of creating new isos. It's probably a low risk, but it is non-zero. I think he thinks otherwise. Trying to discuss it is not just a point-scoring exercise. I think we can all agree that security of the contribs.org infrastructure does matter. > Can we get back to the priority at the minute which is organisation and > direction ? Just do it. _______________________________________________ Discussion about project organisation and overall direction To unsubscribe, e-mail [email protected] Searchable archive at http://lists.contribs.org/mailman/public/discussion/
