> From: John Crisp > > 80 bugs waiting for verification - I cannot get any more specific than > > that. I've made a page for it and its linked from the forums > > http://wiki.contribs.org/Verification_Queue > > Ah, now there's a thing. Can we list the order of statuses involved in > the bug process if they aren't already. e.g. new, resolved, confirmed etc
http://wiki.contribs.org/Bugzilla_Help > I figured that the packages on the list were 'Resolved' as in finished > and hadn't appreciated that they needed to be verified as well ?? Might > seem obvious to some...... but not all. :-) > I presume there should be a link for the SME v9 page to the above where > it says : > > "Verify fixed bugs" The SME9Alpha page has a big box saying verify bugs. The SME_Server_9.0_Development page now has several links to it. This page was way out of date. > I notice that leads to 40 odd v9 bugs + v8 ones. 62 bugs waiting to be verified, 42 are v9, 4 are v8, 16 are contribs. > What about the 20 odd that are on the v9 page here : > http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server_9.0_Development They are open, so need someone to fix them first. This part goes quite well with multiple bugs being fixed each day - but the verification queue is just growing bigger by the day. > > >> Do we have anything similar for v8 ? > > > > What we need for v8 and v9, is a guide to testing. Essentially step > > through each page in the server-manager and try everything, and check > > the logs. > > > > It would be great if someone could step up and create this. > > > Sure there is some lunatic docs freak out there, eh Terry ? ;-) http://wiki.contribs.org/SME9.0_QA is a start. Essentially the SME 8 page copied to SME9. Still needs a lot of work. Volunteers might find this easier than 'just test'. Ian _______________________________________________ Discussion about project organisation and overall direction To unsubscribe, e-mail [email protected] Searchable archive at http://lists.contribs.org/mailman/public/discussion/
