Hi, Looks to me like there's work to get done, so I'd rather vote in favor of those who are getting it done, rather than anyone debating the ins and outs of exactly who/how/under what piece of paper:
+1 for option 3 -Mike On Sat, 2013-06-29 at 10:33 +0100, Dave Liquorice wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 22:10:56 -0700, Greg Zartman wrote: > > > It appears that there are some who feel the current Koozali Foundation and > > Board of Directors is illegitimate and has no community backing because it > > was formed instead of officially voted in. > > How is any other new organisation formed? A group of like minded people get > together and get on with it. No votes or elections they just do it. > > Who is this this other group? Where are their proposals? Where is *their* > vote? I *DO NOT* expect this information to come from Koozali it *MUST* come > from those who wish to form this other group. > > I have great admiration for those putting their time, effort and money into > Koozali. They have got off their backsides and are doing something positive. > > > Vote on it so that we can move forward in a productive fashion without > > even the implication of illegitimacy, one way or the other. > > Is there an independant "vote" site somewhere? One that takes the IP address > of the origin and requires some form of confirmation (respond to an email?) > to register a legitimate vote? > > In the meantime my X goes against option 3. > _______________________________________________ Discussion about project organisation and overall direction To unsubscribe, e-mail [email protected] Searchable archive at http://lists.contribs.org/mailman/public/discussion/
